What is CRAAP Test?

At first glance, information sources are often judged by two aspects - the title and therefore the author.

As we search for valid content, The CRAAP Test is very beneficial and mostly used. This test is a generally used technique for fast analyzing information sources.

Unfortunately, most people don’t see whole articles anymore, which is one reason why so much misinformation is distributed. We all know someone who’s given an article without reading it and it usually didn’t finish well.


Imagine a person read an article instead of just clicking “share” because of the title. They force see when the report was published, which helps prepare its currency. Timeliness is an important attribute to consider because some information becomes out-of-date after some time. Outdated factual information, like a research project, maybe an example of what information obsolescence can appear as if.


Defining relevancy requires two things: a perception of how the information is relevant to a topic and how it’s relevant to your research. An article might have one sentence dedicated to your research topic. However, does it, as an entire, add anything useful to your research? For example, let’s say I’m researching alpaca husbandry.

This article published in Nature on the biomechanics of camelids’ footpads is fascinating but it doesn’t answer my question about how to raise alpacas. The only relevant aspect of this text to my research is that it's about camelids. Does the article’s lack of relevancy to my topic make it a nasty article? No. It’s just irrelevant to my research.


couple of topics we can ask ourselves before reading an article are: “Who wrote this? Do they have the power to speak on this subject?” Concluding out whether or not a person has authority in their field is a relatively easy task. Nearly everyone is often searched on the web, including their credentials.

Book and academic article authors are the easiest to determine because their credentials are usually listed within the published work. Authors who publish online on certain sites are usually the next easiest to grasp out.


Examining information against its accuracy involves doing a little research. If an article states something as “fact” then that fact should be backed up with a reference. Citations are digital or physical paper traces to sources of information. We had many of the authors, titles, publications, etc. as references for our research.

References are used to explain where you got your information. Referring to sources of information helps verify the claims an author is making. If a person can’t prove their claims with good, correct evidence then alert bells should be ringing in your head.


Honestly, the simplest thanks to determining a bit of data aim to read it in its entirety. Make the judgment call for why it exists after you’ve got the entire story. But, it’s still possible to know the aim by glancing at the language utilized in the article.

Is the purpose to simply share information? or is it meant to entertain? Is it written for academic audiences or everyday readers? Is it a research article or a judgment piece? Does the author use a specific style, like in an academic source, or everyday language?


It is generally accepted that the current information aspect places an increasing burden on the information consumer. The lack of editorial control in a web environment, coupled with personalized search engine results and filter bubbles of disinformation on social media makes obvious the need for keepers to grow our guidance to teach and encourage lateral, fact-checking behaviors and dispositions.

Like this website? Create yours in under 2 minutes.